Can E-Bikes Replace
Short Car Trips?

Can E-Bikes Replace
Short Car Trips?

Transport is probably one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonize, particularly due to its high reliance on fossil fuel use and carbon-intensive infrastructure, as well as the way it imposes lifestyles that require people to go everywhere in large cars.

One easy way we can all contribute to combating climate change and minimize overall carbon footprint is to stop burning gasoline in order to get around and swap cars for e-bikes. These new transportation modes are bringing alternative ways to navigate short distances, and with 55% of all trips being under five miles in the U.S, the opportunity for disruption is huge.

The aim of this report is to quantify and better understand the potential of increasing e-bike uptake in the U.S and the advantages that may accrue as a result. Our research arm has used a small portion of the data to demonstrate a very straightforward way U.S states and cities can drastically reduce congestion and deliver environmental and economic benefits.

KEY FINDINGS

  • 55% of Car Trips in the U.S Are Less Than 5 Miles.
  • In national level, cars emit 551,940 metric tons of CO2 daily, at a 5-mile range.
  • Top carbon-emitting states in the US for short car trips are California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, and Massachusetts.
  • Lowest carbon-emitting states in the US for short car trips are Alaska, Wyoming, North Dakota, Vermont, South Dakota, Montana, Washington D.C., Delaware, Hawai, and Rhode Island.
  • If Americans replaced 50% of their short-distance car trips with e-bikes, we would save 273K metric tons of CO2 every day, which is equivalent to the carbon sequestered by 4.5 million tree seedlings grown for 10 years.
  • If Americans replaced only 8% of their short-distance car trips with e-bikes, we would save 44K metric tons of CO2 every day, which is equivalent to the carbon sequestered by 724,496 tree seedlings grown for 10 years.
  • Washington D.C, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Ohio are the top 5 states for e-bike potential with >57% of their car trips being up to 5 miles.
  • Washington D.C has the highest proportion of short-distance trips in the US: 64% of trips are less than 5 miles. If only 8% percent of these short trips are replaced with e-bikes would save DC 137 metric tons of CO2 daily, the equivalent amount of CO2 released by 150 return flights from London to New York.
  • Switching from cars to e-bikes, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Ohio together would save our country 2,753 metric tons of CO2 every day at an 8% adoption rate. This is equivalent to CO2 emissions from 334 million smartphones charged.
  • If only 8% of short-car trips are replaced with e-bikes, bay staters would see a daily 216 metric tons of CO2 reduction, equivalent to 235 return flights from London to New York.
  • California leads all fifty U.S states in CO2 emissions from transport. In fact, at 51,370 metric tons of CO2 emitted by cars every day in California, D.C doesn’t even come close. If only 8% of car trips in California were to be replaced with e-bikes, our country would save 4,078 metric tons of CO2 every day, enough to power 496 million smartphones. This is almost equal to the combined CO2 emissions saved in D.C, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Wyoming, and Ohio together.

Cars Account For the Largest Chunk of CO2

Cars, Americans’ most preferred mode of transport and unfortunately the most environmentally unfriendly one, are the largest source of CO2 emissions in the U.S. These vehicles run primarily on gasoline and account for 40.5% of transportation emission in 2020. Medium and light trucks account for 25.5% and 17.2% respectively, while other transportation modes such as aircraft, rail, ships and boats make up 14.8%.

A healthy planet is critical to human health and happiness, and dramatically reducing our reliance on fossil fuels is one of the most important actions that we can take in order to achieve this goal. In order to lead us away from toxic emissions and toward a sustainable future, we need a fundamental change not only in the way we consume but also in the way we get around. But here comes the good news: 55% of Trips in the U.S Are Less Than 5 Miles 

55% of Trips in the U.S Are Less Than 5 Miles

This means that if you’re like most Americans, you likely drive fairly short distances, as 55% of car trips are five miles or less, — small distances that, in any reasonable world, would be considerably more readily traveled by active transportation modes such as bikes and e-bikes.

Of course, we are not underestimating the challenges that come with replacing even a small percentage of these car trips with e-bikes. Americans always have had the propensity to avoid riding their bikes for transportation. However, e-bikes have made it much easier to get around and not find yourself breaking a sweat or huffing it after just a few blocks.

Avoiding a short car trip to work, the playground, and the supermarket may not appear to be a decision with such an impact on your climate-conscious day-planner, but all of those miles add up. In fact, short trips are shown to be more polluting per mile than longer trips because even if their emissions levels across the board ultimately decrease, their deadly pollution spikes in the first few minutes of driving, according to Colorado Department of Transportation.

To this end, e-bikes have the potential to replace short-distance car rides, helping minimize Co2 emissions and changing urban mobility habits. The question becomes how to unlock this potential? Below we will explore how much change is possible, where and how e-bikes can be part of the solution.

Which U.S State Emits the Most CO2 at a 5 Mile Range?

Our country’s 276 million registered vehicles make U.S consumers heavily dependent on their cars as their primary means of transportation, generating 551,940 metric tons of CO2 daily, at a 5-mile range!

States in the U.S contribute varying amounts of CO2 depending on factors such as population, economic structure and government policies. Here are the states with the most carbon dioxide emissions rates for car trips up to 5 miles:

The largest contributors of CO2 in the U.S (in percentages)

States like California, Texas, New York, Florida, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, and Massachusetts are states that produce the most CO2 for short trips in the U.S and they are responsible for over half of the country’s total carbon emissions, which is nearly equal to the combined emissions of Croatia, Denmark and Portugal or all of Belgium’s emissions. 

 

Large states like Texas and California tend to have the highest emissions on an absolute basis, producing more CO2 than Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, and Massachusetts together. 

There are some crucial indicators that accurately predict which states have the largest CO2 footprints and we can look at this in two parts. To begin with, states with the most significant CO2 emissions are states located in the east (Illinois, Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, North Carolina) while all of the lowest carbon-emitting states are in the north (Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Idaho, Wyoming).

On the other hand, the states with the largest share of transportation emissions are also generally locations where people drive a lot. They have become increasingly urbanized and suburbanized, making trips around large metro areas result in more CO2 emissions. 

How Much CO2 Can E-bikes Save?

E-bike carbon reduction capability is the maximum cumulative carbon dioxide emission reduction potential that could be achieved if people replaced as many of their short car trips with an e-bike as possible. Nationally, this could be more than 200 million metric tons per year, which would save 98% of current CO2 emitted from cars at 5 miles.

At 5 miles, an e-bike is responsible for 15.55g of CO2 while a car emits a whopping 2020g! This means that by cutting a file mile trip out of your schedule each weekday, the modal shift would see a 540K daily reduction in CO2 emissions- the equivalent amount of CO2 released by 240 return flights from London to New York.

Obviously, this is a rather quantitative and idealistic approach. There are significant barriers to replacing even a small percentage of car trips on our roads with e-bike trips. Therefore, we decided to take a more realistic and conservative approach, using only 8% and 50% adoption rates.

At a national level, if Americans replaced 50% of their short-distance car trips with e-bikes, we would save a whopping 273K metric tons of CO2 every day. If you have a hard time putting these numbers in context, this is equivalent to carbon sequestered by 4.5 million tree seedlings grown for 10 years. Even with a substitute effect of only 8%, e-bikes would replace enough car trips to represent a substantial share of CO2 saved. 

replacing short car trips

Below we will see in which states e-bikes can have the highest potential for disruption and how much CO2 they can save based on these adoption rates.

States with the Highest Potential to Replace Car Trips With E-Bikes

Analyzing thousands of data points from CENSUS and US Environmental Protection Agency, we ranked the U.S states where e-bikes have the most potential to replace car trips with e-bikes. Then we used low (8%), and high (50%) replacement rates of short car trips to show how much CO2 each state would save per day if these adoption rates were to

United States of America / States Trips 1-5 Miles CO2 MT Emitted CO2 MT Reduced with 8% Adoption Rate # of Smartphones Charged # of Return Plane Flights NY - LDN # of Trees To Sequester This CO2 for 10 Yrs.
Alaska 51.5% 1.1K 88 10M 96 1.4K
Alabama 49.5% 6.9K 550 66M 599 9K
Arkansas 51% 4.2K 336 40M 366 5.5K
Arizona 50.8% 9.7K 774 94M 844 12K
California 55.2% 51.3K 4,078 49M 4,442 67K
Colorado 52.7% 11K 873 106M 951 14K
Connecticut 57.5% 6.8K 545 66M 594 9K
Washington D.C 64.7% 1.7K 137 16M 150 2.2K
Delaware 56% 1.7K 137 16M 149 2.2K
Florida 57.2% 32.4K 2,575 313M 2,805 42K
Georgia 52.6% 15.9K 1,263 153M 1,376 20K
Hawaii 57.1% 1.8K 146 17M 159 2.4K
Idaho 53.8% 5.8K 463 56M 504 7.6K
Illinois 50.4% 2.4K 191 23M 209 3.1K
Indiana 57% 23.5K 1,869 227M 2,037 30K
Iowa 55.8% 13.4K 1,064 129M 1,159 17K
Kansas 57.2% 5.6K 450 54M 490 7.4K
Kentucky 52.2% 8.3K 665 80M 724 10K
Louisiana 53.5% 7.8K 621 75M 676 10K
Maine 58.6% 15K 1,266 153M 1,379 20K
Maryland 57% 11K 883 107M 962 14K
Massachusetts 50.8% 2.7K 216 26M 235 3.5K
Michigan 56.1% 19.1K 1,520 184M 1,656 25K
Minnesota 54% 10.4K 826 100M 900 13K
Missouri 53.3% 10K 796 96M 868 13K
Mississippi 48.8% 4K 320 38M 348 5.2K
Montana 52.6% 1.6K 130 15M 142 2.1K
North Carolina 54.4% 18.6K 1,484 180M 1,617 24K
North Dakota 54.6% 1.2K 103 12M 112 1.6K
Nebraska 55.7% 3.5K 285 34M 310 4.7K
New Hampshire 53.5% 2.8K 230 27M 250 3.7K
New Jersey 56.9% 15.7K 1,253 152M 1,365 20K
New Mexico 53.6% 3.8K 306 37M 334 5K
Nevada 53.7% 4.7K 377 45M 411 6.2K
New York 55.8% 39.7K 3,157 384M 3,439 52K
Ohio 57.4% 22.9K 1,822 221M 1,984 30K
Oklahoma 54% 6.1K 485 59M 528 8K
Oregon 53.7% 6.7K 539 65M 587 8.9K
Pennsylvania 56.7% 24.4K 1,939 235M 2,112 32K
Rhode Island 61% 2.1K 171 20M 186 2.8K
South Carolina 53.4% 8.3K 662 80M 721 10K
South Dakota 53.2% 1.5K 120 14M 131 1.9K
Tennessee 53.7% 11.8K 942 114M 1,026 15K
Texas 54.2% 41.1K 3,267 397M 3,558 54K
Utah 54.6% 5.2K 420 51M 458 6.9K
Virginia 55.5% 15.7K 1,248 151M 1,359 20K
Vermont 49.1% 1.2K 101 12M 110 1.6K
Washington 51.5% 10.9K 867 105M 945 14K
Wisconsin 55.6% 11.7K 936 113M 1,019 15K
West Virginia 48.8% 2.8K 227 27M 248 3.7K
Wyoming 57.3% 1.1K 91 11M 99 1.5K
United States of America / States Trips 1-5 Miles CO2 MT Emitted CO2 MT Reduced with 50% Adoption Rate # of Smartphones Charged # of Return Plane Flights NY - LDN # of Trees To Sequester This CO2 for 10 Yrs.
Alaska 51.5% 1.1K 549 66M 598 9K
Alabama 49.5% 6.9K 3,439 418M 3,746 56K
Arkansas 51.0% 4.2K 2,100 255M 2,288 34K
Arizona 50.8% 9.7K 4,840 588M 5,272 80K
California 55.2% 51K 25,488 3B 27,764 421K
Colorado 52.7% 11K 5,457 663M 5,944 90K
Connecticut 57.5% 6.8K 3,409 414M 3,713 56K
Washington D.C 64.7% 1.7K 860 104M 937 14K
Delaware 56% 1.7K 855 104M 931 14K
Florida 57.2% 32.4K 16,094 1.9B 17,531 266K
Georgia 52.6% 15.9K 7,893 960M 8,598 130K
Hawaii 57.1% 1.8K 912 110M 994 15K
Idaho 53.8% 5.8K 2,894 352M 3,153 47K
Illinois 50.4% 2.4K 1,199 145M 1,306 19K
Indiana 57% 23.5K 11,686 1.4B 12,729 193K
Iowa 55.8% 13.4K 6,649 808M 7,243 109K
Kansas 57.2% 5.6K 2,810 341M 3,061 46K
Kentucky 52.2% 8.3K 4,154 505M 4,525 68K
Louisiana 53.5% 7.8K 3,881 472M 4,228 64K
Maine 58.6% 15.9K 7,910 962M 8,616 130K
Maryland 57% 11K 5,521 671M 6,014 91K
Massachusetts 50.8% 2.7K 1,350 164M 1,471 22K
Michigan 56.1% 19.1K 9,500 1B 10,348 157K
Minnesota 54% 10.4K 5,162 627M 5,623 85K
Missouri 53.3% 10K 4,978 605M 5,422 82K
Mississippi 48.8% 4K 1,998 243M 2,177 33K
Montana 52.6% 1.6K 813 98M 885 13K
North Carolina 54.4% 18.6K 9,277 1B 10,105 153K
North Dakota 54.6% 1.2K 641 78M 699 10K
Nebraska 55.7% 3.5K 1,781 216M 1,940 29K
New Hampshire 53.5% 2.8K 1,435 174M 1,563 23K
New Jersey 56.9% 15.7K 7,829 952M 8,528 129K
New Mexico 53.6% 3.8K 1,914 232M 2,085 31K
Nevada 53.7% 4.7K 2,358 286M 2,568 38K
New York 55.8% 39.7K 19,733 2.4B 21,495 326K
Ohio 57.4% 22.9K 11,385 1.3B 12,402 188K
Oklahoma 54.0% 6.1K 3,032 368M 3,302 50K
Oregon 53.7% 6.7K 3,368 409M 3,669 55K
Pennsylvania 56.7% 24.4K 12,119 1.4B 13,202 200K
Rhode Island 61.0% 2.1K 1,067 129M 1,162 17K
South Carolina 53.4% 8.3K 4,137 503M 4,506 68K
South Dakota 53.2% 1.5K 752 91M 819 12K
Tennessee 53.7% 11.8K 5,885 715M 6,411 97K
Texas 54.2% 41K 20,417 2.4B 22,240 337K
Utah 54.6% 5.2K 2,627 319M 2,862 43K
Virginia 55.5% 15.7K 7,799 948M 8,495 128K
Vermont 49.1% 1.2K 631 76M 688 10K
Washington 51.5% 10.9K 5,420 659M 5,904 89K
Wisconsin 55.6% 11.7K 5,849 711M 6,371 96K
West Virginia 48.8% 2.8K 1,421 172M 1,547 23K
Wyoming 57.3% 1.1K 569 69M 620 9.4K

D.C Gets the Best Deal

E-bikes could thrive in a state like D.C where people are urged to ditch their cars and take up cycling due to looming congestion pricing tolls and an increase of protected bike lanes. Not only that but, the high proportion of short-distance trips in the D.C (64% of trips are less than 5 miles) highlights the state’s high profile for e-bikes to harvest their use to the fullest potential.

Based on our calculations, we have estimated that switching only 8% percent of these short trips with e-bikes would save DC 137 metric tons of CO2 daily, the equivalent amount of CO2 released by 150 return flights from London to New York.

The Rest of the Top 5 States for E-bike Potential

Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Ohio comprise the other top 4 U.S states that could benefit the most from e-biking due to their relatively short-distance trips that could be switched from cars to e-bikes. Part of this can be explained by these states’ high population density and relatively small geographic size. Additionally, these states are known for engaging in urban planning on the neighborhood level, allowing them to smoothly switch to e-bikes and save the planet along the way.

Switching from cars to e-bikes, these states together would save our country 2,753 metric tons of CO2 every day at an 8% adoption rate. This is equivalent to CO2 emissions from 334 million smartphones charged.

Among the top 5 states for e-bike potential, Massachusetts is the perfect example of a place where short car trips can be replaced with e-bikes. Mos of the cities in Massachusetts are known as waking towns and have easy access to public transit. With 50.81% of trips less than 5 miles, Massachusetts is one of the easiest states to get around on two-wheels and ride with minimal exposure to traffic.

If only 8% of short-car trips are replaced with e-bikes

bay staters would see a daily

216 metric ton of CO2

reduction, equivalent to 235 return flights from London to New York.

The Country's Biggest CO2 Emitters Rank Below the Top 10

It’s no surprise that large and heavily populated states rank lower in the list, but they’re also the country’s hotbed for CO2 emissions. Targeting the big polluters will help generate greater CO2 savings, and alleviate how buying wood affects environments. While California (ranked 21st), Texas (25th ), New York (ranked 16th) have lesser 0–5-mile trips (55%,54% and 55% respectively) than DC or Rhode Island (both over 61%), they are states famous for their love affair with cars and products of high CO2 emissions.

For instance, California leads all fifty U.S states in CO2 emissions from transport. In fact, at 51,370 metric tons of CO2 emitted by cars every day in California, D.C doesn’t even come close. If only 8% of car trips in California were to be replaced with e-bikes, our country would save 4,078 metric tons of CO2 every day, enough to power 496 million smartphones. This is almost equal to the combined CO2 emissions saved in D.C, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Wyoming and Ohio together.

Bottom States for E-bike Potential

Mississippi (48%), West Virgina (48%), Vermont (49%), Alabama (49%) rank at the bottom of the list due to their lower distribution of short duration trips compared to denser states such as D.C or Florida. However, this does not mean these states are not primed for e-bikes to replace short car trips; they all have over 45% of trips consisting less than 5 miles, making them appealing and a great opportunity for 5-mile car trips displacement and CO2 reduction.

In fact, no matter where you live in the U.S switching from cars to e-bikes will greatly reduce carbon emissions and positively impact the planet. So just because you are not living in D.C doesn’t mean you will get a bad deal on e-bike potential. You can still substitute short car trips and do something good for the environment, by using sustainable transport options regardless of which state you call home.

Ask the Experts

Now that we know the importance of e-bikes, we asked an expert to provide some advice and predictions on micromobility in the U.S. Read his thoughts below

Mr. John MacArthur

The Sustainable Transportation Program Manager at TREC (Portland State University).

What are your thoughts about the state of micromobility in the United States today?

Before COVID, micromobility was expanding, especially with the increase of e-scooters in cities and the growth of e-bike share. I think we will continue to see this trend into the future as cities are encourage micromobility options.  The same goes with personally owned bikes or other micromobility devices.  Cities are investing in infrastructure expansion which is a key implementation driver for micromobility.  Finally, the large legacy brands have fully embraced the e-bike market which will provide a broader range of bikes at different price points. With the growing interest in incentive and outreach programs at the city and state levels, we should see a strong continued growth. 

 

How can cities change their street designs to accommodate the technology?

As stated above, cities are investing in expanding bike and multipurpose path infrastructure. Cities like Seattle, Chicago, Portland, DC, and New York are actively expanding their networks. There is interest in rethinking street design to add micromobility lanes which would provide wider spaces in the roadway for micromobility  vehicles. We shall see how cities approach this concept and the public discourse on repurposing travel lanes for transit and micromobility only vehicles. 

 

How do you see the technology developing? Will people buy more E-bikes in the near future? How will cities handle micromobility devices in the coming years?

The technology is developing very fast and there is a growth of opportunity in the space to include micromobility  devices in the connected vehicle environment. E-bikes sales will continue to be a strong market, as long as product supplies can meet demand. Cities will be challenged in the future to manage the shared mobility market and the opportunities it can provide for people.  Part of this will be the potential number micromobility trips but also the use of shared spaces. Lastly, cities need to focus on inclusive and equitable shared mobility to provide underserved communities with enhanced and affordable mobility options.

 

Looking Forward

We must change our minds in the face of the climate crisis. Policymakers must look beyond what they believe people want and instead prepare for a transportation system that minimizes CO2 emissions while also delivering efficient, accessible mobility for everyone. E-bikes have the potential to help get cars off the road while also lowering emissions, pollution, and gas consumption.

When more than half of all trips in the U.S are less than 5 miles (a short e-bike ride), you’ll be surprised how simple it is to hop off your car and onto two wheels while having fun, riding with friends and protecting the environment along the way.

mETHODOLOGY

  • For this study, we used data for short trips (1-5 miles) from the US Department of Transportation – Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Daily Trips by Distance – National and State (data as of 2022/01/08). These data capture trips by all modes of transportation (driving, rail, transit, and air).
  • According to CENSUS, 84.8% of Americans use cars as their main mode of transportation when commuting to work, we used this rate as a sample in order to subtract only short trips taken by cars from the report of Bureau of Transportation Statistics [Daily Trips by Distance – National and State].
  • To identify how much CO2 is emitted by cars daily for short trips 1-5 miles in each US state and to see which states are contributing the most to the daily national carbon pollution, we used the average CO2 emitted by cars from the US Environmental Protection Agency: 404 grams of CO2 per mile.
  • To draw a comparison between cars and electric bikes’ carbon footprint, we used the average CO2 emitted by e-bikes by considering only the time spent on the road (as calculated by Bosch E-Bikes) with the electricity consumption resulting in an average CO2 value of 2-5g/km (3.11 g/miles). Then we used low (8%), and high (50%) replacement rates of short car trips (1-5 miles) to show how much CO2 each state would save per day if 8-50% of short car trips were to be replaced by e-bikes trips.
  • In order to contextualize the cumulative CO2 figures, we used the EPA’s and Guardian’s calculators.

MEDIA CONTACTS

Fatbardhë Maloku

Sr. Digital PR Specialist

[email protected]

 

Dardan Shehu

Sr. Content Marketing Specialist

[email protected]

 

Brayden Lucas 

Outreach Specialist 

[email protected]